The Network Addressing Collegiate Alcohol and Other Drug Issues

The Internet is buzzing with news about powdered alcohol.  The company Lipsmark, has apparently applied for approval to market a product they're calling Palcohol, a packet of powder that when mixed with water will create an alcoholic beverage.  Lipsmark is applying for a patent for their manufacturing processes, but we're also learning that the process for making such powders is not actually new, or even that difficult.

A simple Google search will yield articles describing the manufacturing process, and also informs us that such products are already being sold in various countries.  Essentially the process to make this involves using a highly absorbent powder, adding liquid alcohol, and then sifting it to break it back up into powder.  Perhaps the most important marketing element that Lipsmark is offering is a sealed pouch so that the alcohol does not evaporate back out while it sits on the store shelf.

Even though Palcohol is not currently available, media hoopla may cause powdered alcohol to be used by students.  How is that possible? Articles in established magazines like Popular Science not only tell how to make it, they even have links to purchase the supplies.  Is it a surprise that the suppliers report that the base powder is now on back order?

So this means… keep powdered alcohol on your RADAR, and understand that regardless of regulation, with every "new" alcoholic product, a homemade version is almost always just a few keystrokes away. 

Today is the day!  Looking forward to an amazing conference here in Camarillo.  It looks like the conference will set records for attendance and the number of programs offered. Keep an eye on the Network CA twitter feed @stcnetworkca for updates.  Highlights of the conference will be posted at http://www.csuci.edu/atod/ and on twitter at https://twitter.com/ATOD_CSUCI.

The fact that the two teams in the Super Bowl are both from states that have legalized marijuana has certainly sparked the imagination of the legalization camp.  The MPP has purchased billboards making their case.  Now it seems the game is on with word that the SAM anti-legalization group has countered.  It's hard to imagine how the late-night comics could have asked for a better set up.  But the battle may actually be more important than some believe.  The attention the Super Bowl gets, and the obvious stories about legalization that we'll continue to hear will likely help to nationalize the debate.  Rarely discussed is that fact that Super Bowl Sunday is known to be one of the heaviest days for DUI-related crashes.  So as sports fans drink, socialize, and view countless beer ads, they'll also be asked to consider public policy on marijuana. 

In 2010, Proposition 19 was making headlines and prompted me to start a series of presentations on the implications marijuana legalization had on campus prevention efforts.  At the time, the thought of widespread legalization still seemed remote to most in my audiences.  Times have changed.  In only four years, the number of states with medical use has risen by 50% and two states have legalized non-medical use. 

The Federal government policy has changed as well.  In 2010, Attorney General Harold Holder sent a very specific threat to legalization supporters in California stating that their efforts would violate federal law.  In 2012, not only did Holder not send a similar letter to Colorado and Washington, his office has instead now released “guidance” that the Federal government would watch, but not interfere with their commercial regulation of marijuana.  And today we learn that he is working to smooth the way for the banking industry to participate in the marijuana marketplace.

Other changes may happen just as quickly.  Being considered in Congress are laws that would move marijuana regulation out of the Federal schedule system and into state law.  This effort is receiving bipartisan support.

It is now reasonable to predict that somewhere within the next 1-3 years, full legalization will occur at both the Federal and perhaps many or most states. Even a cursory look at the history of alcohol prohibition repeal makes clear a change like this can sweep across the country very fast.

College campuses must think through their relationship with marijuana.  Most, if not all campuses in states with legalization (medical or otherwise) have relied on the Federal Drug Free Schools and Community Act to continue their prohibition of any marijuana use on their campuses.  But if the Federal government de-schedules marijuana, the DFSCA will not apply any more; issues like medical-use accommodation will come to the fore. 

I’ve heard some campus folks say they’d rely on their campus smoke-free policies to continue their marijuana prohibition.  But there are implications for that as well.  For instance, eatable and drinkable forms of THC consumption are becoming much more prevalent and will likely increase even more rapidly in a commercialized environment.  Those pose unique and perhaps even more serious risks than smoked/vaporized forms. 

Campuses need to start the discussions now.  Explicit harms should be identified that are worthy of preventing.  For instance, many believe we are likely to see a substantial increase in numbers of frequent/heavy consumers, with the concomitant issues of Cannabis Use Disorders.  Given the recent research that continues to point to concerns about heavy use on adolescent brain development, campuses may rightly wish to limit underage and heavy use.  Impaired driving is also likely to result in direct harm to both marijuana consumers and the general public.  Many of those issues will only be solved through campus/community partnerships to assure regulation and enforcement are sufficient.

So this means...Strategies to accomplish prevention of these harms are only starting to emerge.  What is heartening is that in contrast to the uphill efforts to speak about this issue 4 years ago, we are seeing a much more broadly engaged prevention community. At the NASPA AOD conference just completed, there were no fewer than 5 presentations specifically addressing marijuana, and many more that tangentially included it. We may not be able to stop the change, but we can be positioned to shape some policies and prepare for the easily predicted consequences that will come when it happens.  However, we can do our work only if we plan strategically and that may only happen if we are willing to say "when" instead of "if"; and I believe it's time to do just that.  Watch for a series of articles that I'll put on this site that highlight promising approaches to prevention of marijuana harms within a legalized context.